STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Throughout the job there were critical submittals CCC needed prompt reply on in order to complete work per the schedule. Submittals that were delayed (in this case most notably structural steel submittals) caused schedule delays for CCC in ordering materials/completing the work. While many su…
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Incorrectly sized basin-style sinks were installed in the mens and womens toilet rooms, which created a code violation where the egress minimum width of 36" was impeded in the mens toilet room entrance way. The architect sized and placed the basin-style sinks at mens and womens locker rooms but …
Statement of Problem: At bid time GM provided LGR structural reference drawings for their press bay addition. These drawings employed a single-column design concept with a cantilevered bracket to support the crane girders. However, nothing in the RFPS stated that Pontiac had to use a single-column design or copy …
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Throughout the project there was a consistent issue where CCC/IBI failed to reference the bid-time addendum Q&A for final scope direction on design items which were not clear in the RFPS. The two major items which were not followed per the Q&A were: 1) OH door design in blank receiving fo…
8575 GM Ultium 2 Battery Plant STATEMENT OF PROBLEM 1. Bass Datums were not coordinated correctly/accurately. In turn, system integration was challenging. 2. Avaco did not have the skilled help they needed on site. 3. The schedule was built to construct all of Pancake Line-3, and then, all of Pancake NnD Input …
Project Phase: Estimating Delivery Method: General Contract-Sub Estimating made the assumption that VDLs were shipped in and never ran off. CCC doubled hours due to this. Manual provided for installation was not used per VDL Expert.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM During design of the building steel, 4 joists in the blank receiving bay were upsized to accommodate the weight of the blank receiving air handling unit (HVU-1; 17000#) in bay 22/23, based on JEG''''s input. Later in the design phase (50% MEP design), the mechanical engineer rotated and moved th…
Project Phase: Project Delivery Method: General Contract-Sub No mobile bolt bin created field inefficiencies and lost time.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM CCC received the substation equipment shop drawings from GM late in the project, at end of July. In August CCC worked with GM on the rigging plan for hoisting the new substation equipment into the penthouse. IBI performed a structural analysis of the penthouse framing steel and the hoist beam…
Project Phase: Installation Delivery Method: General Contract-Sub Customer and Prime field checks were not complete and / or not accurate.